The Bikau Model

In my last post I revealed that I had been working under an erroneous assumption for about a year. This assumption was that the reflections within a double-helix of elementary particles of energy (kaus) could keep them from spreading into an ever-widening cone. Put simply, I assumed that energy would behave in a similar way to molecules.

While it would have been nice to continue working on a more fundamental level with kaus, that are in no way connected to each other, the geometry that I was finally beginning to understand related to the saint Hannes knot, which I realized related to the reflective gravity of molecules, not kaus. This means that this reflection model requires a significant overhaul. This overhaul relates to the assumption that you can no longer assume a spherical cow. That is, since realizing that the only fundamental interaction between particles of energy is reflection, my model always assumed that the spheres of kau would move independently of each other. While this is still true, if I apply my reflection model to molecules, I cannot assume a spherical molecule. If I can’t assume a spherical cow, perhaps I could simplify molecule to a bispherical cow. This is actually close to how molecules are modeled in biophysics. Molecules are stripped down to the simplest possible elements that still fit the experimental findings. Here is such an example.

So, instead of two independent spheres of the kau model, as depicted in below A), we have two connected spheres, as depicted in the bikau model in B).

The funny thing is that when no longer viewing the motion of individual particles of energy, but the motion of molecules, we can no longer assume linear motion between reflections. Rather the interlinking of the two spheres means that the only way for the spheres to move is either to move in the same direction, or for the movement to be split into a parallel component and a rotational component that must be perpendicular to the parallel component.

In the very simplest model, the movement follows the path depicted below: a bikau rotating around its axis, with the center of the bikau moving in a straight line.

While I won’t show this here, there is no limitation for the center of the kau to also rotate around a point, just as long as this rotation is also perpendicular to the parallel motion of the bikau.

I have a good feeling about this model. Even though it no longer depicts movement as linear, the reason for this is that we’ve zoomed out considerably from the level of the kaus, to the level of molecules, where curved motion is a good enough approximation.

And the good thing is that when I loose the reference to kaus, I can actually include this model into my day job and my publication on the self-assembly of colloidal lignin particles, the topic where I first got the idea of the elementary particle of energy.

So, in the new hybrid lignin-reflective gravity article, I’m not going to explicitly claim as much as in my blog. Rather, I present the hypothesis that reflection causes a gravity-like interaction that causes molecules to move in toroidal orbitals that in some instances can be quasi-spherical. This way, I’m almost certain that I will be peer reviewed. The only danger is that the peer-reviewers insist that I remove any hypotheses not directly linked to experimental observations. But usually if one puts the hypotheses in the supporting information, one is allowed to be a bit more speculative.

Let’s hope for the best.