I’ve been keeping you updated on the fate of my sneaky theory on quantum gravity  these past months (or even years by some counts). While for a moment I thought my manuscript had been accepted , I was soon brought to my senses when the submission tracking system said that the paper was only sent for peer review . Well, today the same tracking system said that the first report is in, only 12 days after the peer-reviewer accepted the assignment!   So, what did the reviewer say?

While I’m waiting for the peer-reviewers comments on my sneaky theory on quantum gravity , I’ve decided to do something difficult. I’ve decided to try to understand the motion of elementary particles of energy (kau) once more, but this time I am applying the equations I learned in the preparation of my quantum gravity paper.   Don’t expect this post to be as clear as the ones I’ve posted in the past few weeks and months. There’s a reason why I abandoned elementary particles o

Today I woke up to a harsh(ish) reality. While in my last post I said that ”my manuscript had been accepted with minor revision”, I also said “except the response was so short that I have a feeling that I have misunderstood it.” Today when I checked what the status of my manuscript was: Your submission is in peer review News about your peer review process ·         The editor has invited 5 reviewer(s) ·         There is 1 reviewer(s) that has accepted to review your manuscri