After the Cross and the Graze post, it seems that I’m at the cusp of forming the 100 % correct model of reflection. As a matter of fact, if I wasn’t aware of all the errors I’ve made during these months (or even years) on working on the Theory of Everything, I’d be tempted to say that what I present today just might be the correct model.
Knowing that I’ve been wrong so many times, how do I feel that this is the correct model? Well, it incorporates all of the required components: the grazing path vectors, the reflection path vectors (both purple in the model), grazing neighbor vectors (green), reflection neighbor vectors (red), and reflection connection vectors (blue). And they are all logical and of the mathematically precise length (or will be when I derive the equations that allows me to make them 100 % precise).
I think the only thing I need to say about the shape that is different from what I’ve said before is that it is comprised of three green-and-red crosses that are identical in shape, but not in orientation. The green vector has a length of a kau particle and the red vector a slightly longer length than that of the green one. The vectors cross at the center of the red vector, but off the center of the green vector. I just about might be able to explain why, but I fear that I don’t understand the concept well enough to make the explanation clear for most readers, so I won’t try.
So, here is the rotating 3D model of the shape:
and here the x-y projection:
the y-z projection:
And the x-z projection:
There’s a bunch of reasons why this shape is very logical. However, it takes only one mistake to shoot the model down. So that’s what I’m going to do next. I’ll try to collapse this house of cards. But if I can’t, this might be the real deal.
I can’t promise any probabilities for the correctness of this model any longer. All I know is that probably for the first time I don’t see any obvious flaws in the model.
Comments