I thought that my next post after the Three Crosses -post, (where I claimed to have found the accurate shape of reflection of elementary particles of energy) would either be to reveal the mathematics behind the shape, or conversely to show how I was wrong.
But something rather peculiar happened. I was twisting and turning the Three Crosses -model in Blender, when I realized that I hadn’t made an error as such, but I had somehow not realized that the shape necessitated there would be two additional connections with kaus/dots (elementary particles of energy).
It’s rather hard to explain this verbally, so I won’t even try. Rather here is the Three Crosses -model with the two additional connections (in yellow):
As far as I understand, the three crosses in the above shape are identical to the one showing only the blue connection vectors. However, the above shape makes more sense in terms of confinement. The above shape means that the kaus at the points of grazing form two helices. An intact yellow helix, and a broken blue helix. Or to be precise, two broken halves of helices, as the two connecting vectors aren’t part of the same helix but are offset by half a turn.
Again, all the above probably sounds very confusing. The take-home-message is that half of the time the kau doesn’t graze past a single kau, but three kaus. That is when the kau passes the intact yellow helix. But half of the time the kau grazes past just a single kau, when it’s neighboring the yellow helix. And whenever it reaches the broken helices, it gets reflected. So, the passage of the kau is like a song in a 4/4 time signature. Where the first and the third note are staccato, and the second and fourth note are glissando. Or you can come up with a more apt musical analogy, if you wish.
I can already begin to imagine how all of this would be illustrated in a movie. Unfortunately, the movie cannot be called The Theory of Everything. That name is already taken.
Comments