The Vacuum Bubble of Dark Matter

I’ve been so preoccupied lately with the minute details of describing the interaction between molecules via reflective gravity that I’ve completely forgotten to think about the high-level repercussions of the theory. Almost two years ago I had presented the hypothesis that “dark matter are van der Waals molecules of hydrogen, larger than 21 cm”. I’ve ditched the concept of the van der Waals molecule a long time ago, not necessarily because it’s wrong, but because it addresses the phenomenon top-down, via known phenomena, and not bottom-up , only resorting to reflection. But an even bigger problem of mine in this large ‘gas-bubble’ model of dark matter was that it somehow didn’t seem right.

Why doesn’t it seem right? Let’s call it intuition. If I assume that in the regular conditions the hydrogen molecules reflecting from each other form supramolecular gas bubbles with size on the range from below a hundred nanometers to over ten micrometers, the change in the size of this bubble is still governed by the interaction of the bubble with electromagnetic radiation. If we consider dark matter by its definition, it should not interact with electromagnetic radiation. What this seems to indicate is that beyond a certain size, the supramolecular gas bubbles don’t grow bigger, because they can only grow bigger by emitting radiation. Or possibly absorbing. I’m still quite confused by all of this.  But anyhow, without interaction with light, the gas bubbles remain within a specific size range.

So, what happens in the vacuum of space? The hydrogen gas bubbles are no longer swimming in a sea of other hydrogen gas bubbles. Rather, the individual hydrogen gas bubbles behave like hydrogen molecules at higher pressure: they form a gas bubble. But this gas bubble isn’t actually a bubble of hydrogen gas, but a bubble of hydrogen gas bubbles. So, to avoid confusion, I won’t call this second level bubble a gas bubble, but rather a vacuum bubble.

And by all logic, a vacuum bubble of hydrogen is an entity that will not interact with electromagnetic radiation and thus follows the definition of dark matter.

I’m not claiming this to be the truth. Any physicist who knows their dark matter might sense that what I say about dark matter comes from a relatively superficial understanding of the experimental observations of how it has been observed. So, there is a real possibility that I’ve completely misunderstood the concept and that what I say here doesn’t fit with its theoretical framework. But at least the understanding of dark matter presented here is not based on top-down logic, but rather on deductive reasoning,  assuming that the only truly fundamental interaction is reflection.

And to liven up this post, here is picture from ChatGPT with the prompt: “Could you draw an illustration of space filled jam-packed with soap bubbles?” Not the greatest of illustrations, but the best of the three free images that can be generated in a day.