November 5th 2023:
For nearly two years I've been working on the theory of everything. From the beginning, the core of the theory was the elementary particle of energy, that I termed a dot.
At first the theory was purely an exercise in logic, following from an observation that molecules do not exist as independent entities, but form supramolecular structures, even in the gaseous and liquid state. In the past few months I have finally realized the mathematical principles around the discreet wave equations of the movement of individual dots.
Some time ago I submitted a manuscript on these findings to Nature, but was informed that the manuscript would be better served in a more specialized journal. Thus I submitted into Scientific Reports, and a few days ago I was notified that the manuscript is under review:
It will take some time for the peer reviewers to give their verdict on the manuscript, so I cannot say that the paper has gained the acceptance of the scientific community. However, the fact that the paper, explicitly stating to offer "The Mathematical Principles of All Physical Interactions Based on the Refraction of Elemental Particles of Energy" is being peer reviewed by a reputable journal indicates that there is nothing inherently wrong in the approach of the manuscript.
Whether the conclusion drawn in the manuscript are correct, will first be evaluated by the peer reviewers and next the scientific community in general (assuming the manuscript is accepted). However, as the manuscript is now under review, I feel that it can also be shown to the general public.
Take note that being under review, the manuscript can still contain errors that will be hopefully found in peer review and corrected before final publication. It is also possible that the peer reviewers find a fundamental fault in the logic of the manuscript, leading to it full rejection. However, I find the probability of this being low.
Here is the submitted manuscript:
And here is its accompanying supplementary information:
And here is an Excel file with all of the data used to draw the plots of the manuscript.
While the manuscript itself has been written for the scientific community, I'll try to present its main finding here as well. If the text and images below appear too vague, you can also read submitted manuscript for more clarity.
The Theory of Everything
1. There are only elementary particles of energy.
2. They are spherical and move at the speed of light.
Everything else about the theory of everything is embedded in these two claims, or postulates. From here we deduce light is a string of these particles, that I call dots.
Figure 1. Features of light: a) Light is a flexible string of dots. Depending on the wavelength of light, the flexibility can be low (large wavelength) or high (small wavelength). b) in vacuum this string is a ring, where each dot moves in a straight line. c) anywhere else light is refracted, causing the ring to stretch into a helix, where each dot moves in a helical path.
In matter, the strings are entangled into a closed loop.
Figure 2. Features of matter: a) two strings of dots entangle into a double helix. b) the double helix closes into a loop.
While in matter there are two entangled strings, there are four different entangled paths that the dots move in. None of the neighboring dots along the same path touch each other.
Figure 3. Features of dots in matter: a) two strings of dots entangle into a double helix. b) The dots in the two strings are divided into four different entangled paths.
Charged particles, like electrons and protons form multiple loops that form a nearly spherical closed loop by turning and indented helix of a double-helix around itself by two turns.
Figure 4. Properties of charged particles: a) a charged particle is an indented helix of a double-helix with multiple turns. b) the helix turns twice around itself to form a nearly spherical closed loop.
Molecules, like hydrogen below, don’t exist at least for a long time as freely moving molecules, but rather attach to each other to form supramolecular structures.
Figure 5. Properties of hydrogen. a) to c) the helix of a double helix of a hydrogen atom, viewed from three directions. d) Hydrogen atom illustrated as half-helical loops around a spherical surface, with arrows to indicate the direction of movement of the dots. b) Two Hydrogen atoms fused into a hydrogen molecule. e) Two hydrogen molecules fused into a supramolecular structure.
All the properties in the universe should be gradually deduced from these principles.
However, I don’t yet have a good idea of how the Theory of Everything explains all physical observations. I would imagine that it will take quite a while to confirm that it really is the theory of everything. I can imagine that there are plenty of people who would wish to add something to it, such as fundamental forces or constants. The only other constant apart from the speed of light that can fit into the theory is the constant radius of the elementary particle of energy. All other constants should be deducible from what was presented in postulates one and two.
I guess the only thing that I could add here is that based on this theory, most of spacetime is supramolecular hydrogen. You can imagine the sun, the planets and everything in this universe skipping in a ‘quantum foam’ of hydrogen, where the theory of relativity still holds, but the curvature of space-time has a way of being understood. Well, I don’t exactly understand it properly yet but I probably will once I, or someone else, shows how relativity acts via this quantum foam.
コメント