The Electromagnetic Counterwave

I’ve been writing the manuscript on reflective gravity for some time now and I’ve been digging deep into the mathematics of waves. Doing that I think I’ve just hit the jackpot! I finally have a model for electromagnetic radiation (i.e. light and it’s friends of many wavelengths) that seems to match the description I see on Wikipedia (and elsewhere). The only problem is that I don’t know enough about light to be 100 % sure whether I’m correct or not. So I’ll probably introduce the idea as something that might relate to the motion of supramolecular waves but that also might be applicable elsewhere.

This new insight is the realization that you can have two neighboring helical waves moving in synchrony, both rotating to the opposite direction to each other, but otherwise identical. What I mean is that you can place to waves of opposite rotation right next to each other and they won’t even overlap, just as long as you offset them from each other by a tiny amount. I even made an animation on the concept with Blender, but for some reason I couldn’t get it to render. So, here’s the next best thing. The model, where the waves aren’t moving, but at least the 3D model is rotating:

That’s a quirk of Blender. I can make an exportable 3D model, which I open in PowerPoint. I can make the model rotate in PowerPoint but I can make it do anything fancier.

So, why would the above model be that important? Well, while my old model had a single wave rotating in one direction, you can’t really have one wave carrying two functions: both an electric and a magnetic field. Or that’s what I think. And if you only had one helix, wouldn’t it be prone to dissipate into air in the first collision with matter?

While I can’t be sure, I’ve noticed that following Occam’s razor has served me well in the past:

"Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity"

Well, applying it here multiplying by two seems just the right amount for waves.

But I won’t be saying anything too concrete about light in the reflective gravity -manuscript. The reason being Mr. Occam once more. Even if I was mostly correct, introducing uncertainty will reduce people’s trust in the more rigorous theory. This isn’t my idea, but I couldn’t find who said it first. ChatGPT suggested it might be Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, or Carl Hovland, but I couldn’t find anything that exactly matched the idea.

Anyhow, I’m pretty close to finishing my first rough draft of the manuscript. However, I already know that I have to edit it quite a bit until I can be at all happy with it. Also, because it’s also an experimental paper, I actually do need to make some more experiments. But these aren’t directly about the theory of everything, but rather about my lignin adhesives and coatings.

I just feel that it’s going to be one of the weirdest papers ever. It’s going to deal with mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and a bit of engineering. But what can I do? Everything is connected…