Lately I’ve been trying to understand the deeper meaning of the quantized nature of the interaction of light with matter. This time with a closer link with the actual physics and not just the basic geometry of supramolecular shells.
I have already talked about the conversion of the Rydberg formula to represent the interaction of a ring of light with two scales of supramolecular shells. However, I’ve had serious problems in understanding what physically takes place in the process. Conventional quantum mechanics more or less ignore this question, as it assumes that there is nothing taking place that could be understood by common sense. The only requirement is that the mathematics add up.
If, on the other hand, we want to really understand what’s going on, we have to open the equation up a bit. The Rydberg constant for hydrogen is:
Thus, the Rydberg formula can be rewritten also as:
Here mp refers to the mass of the proton, whereas me refers to that of the electron. We’ll ignore the other values for now and concentrate on the role of the proton and the electron. I have quite a strong intuition that what takes place in the supramolecular shells of hydrogen is analogous to the generation of protons in water. While in the counterevidence paper I describe the grinding of supramolecular shells of water releasing protons into water, what seems apparent is that in hydrogen, the proton is what is left in the supramolecular shells and what is cleaved in the grinding of the shells is an electron.
This grinding of the shells can also be described as strumming of two adjacent loops against each other. What appears to take place is that electrons are formed at the intersections of the shells. The scheme below shows the same color coding as in the counterevidence manuscript, with the direction of rotation of blue double spheres is reverse that of the yellow double spheres. And the green double spheres are misaligned to rest of the Waterman cluster, due to the thermal rotation of the cluster. Unlike with water, the size of the Waterman cluster of hydrogen isn’t always the smallest possible truncated octahedron, but for simplicity, I’ll use this shape.
Waterman cluster of supramolecular shells, showing longitudinal loops and latitudinal grinding paths
The scheme shows two kinds of lines across the surface. The longitudinal lines reflect the loops that make up the supramolecular orbital (the number of loops is really so high that individual loops could not be visible), whereas the latitudinal lines reflect the points of contact as the supramolecular shell rotates. So, to some extent the latitudinal line is ‘half-true’. Based on this ‘strumming model’, there is a constant stream of electrons generated as the supramolecular shells rotate. Whether these electrons remain in the location where they are generated, or whether they are released, is unclear to me.
So, what does the complicated-looking equation mean? I still need to look more deeply into the current theory to get a better handle on it. It appears that while a fraction of the hydrogen string loops into an electron, the string isn’t really detached from the ‘reduced hydrogen’, or proton. The two loops are still in physical contact. But what else is going on and what all of the terms in the equation mean, isn’t clear to me.
But we can still tidy the equation. We know that
and
Just don’t ask me why. Anyhow, by placing these into the equation, we get:
Here α is a non-dimensional unit called the fine structure constant, an h the Planck constant. If we take a leap of faith and say that it’s not the Planck constant that’s the most fundamental unit, but the Planck length, lP, which we know to be
where G = 6.67430x10-11 m3kg-1s-2 is the gravitational constant, we can still rewrite the equation as:
Now we’re mostly left with tangible physical quantities: the masses of the proton and electron, the diameter of the Planck spheres, their speed and the diameters of the ring of light and the supramolecular shells. The only question marks are the fine structure constant and the gravitational constant.
To be honest, all of this still leave me with a slight headache. While the Planck length and the speed of light appear to be true constants, all of the rest of the terms seem to be derived from the interactions of these Planck spheres. However, I (nor anybody else) don’t have a clue as to how to derive these values from the two true constants.
For the gravitational constant I have hunch. It relates to the aggregation of supramolecular shells. But exactly how it would be derived is still a mystery to me.
All I know is that the solution has to be more or less geometrical. That is, it shouldn't involve forces in the traditional sense. Or more specifically the only force is the geometry acting on the momentum on the Planck spheres. The definition of force is "the rate of change of the momentum of a particle is equal to the instantaneous force F acting on it.”
So, all in all, the theory of everything seems to be rather musical. The supramolecular shell is like a very curious mix of a string and a percussion instrument. The strings make up a continuous membrane across two spherical surfaces, which release electrons, protons, or even more complex entities, like ions, depending on the supramolecular shell.
Supramolecular shell is mix between a violin and bongo drums
Next we just need to figure out the music theory of how these 'natural instruments' are played. And this isn't just figurative. For some time I've been aware that the harmonics in music appear to relate to the properties of the waterman clusters of supramolecular shells of atmospheric gases and water vapor.
Comentarios