In my last post I stated that fundamental forces are not really fundamental, as they are an emergent property of the interaction of the momentum of the dots of strings moving at the speed of light colliding in different conditions: in the rotation of supramolecular shells, in the collision of the knotted strings within the molecular orbital and the packing of the strings of atoms more complex than hydrogen. Gravity is indirectly related to the collision of the supramolecular shells, as they move in the same common frame of reference.
The equations describing fundamental interactions do need to change when we realize that the explanation of their emergence. At least they do not need to change if we wish to remain within the uncertainty principle. To add more precision, we need a better mathematical model, but we don’t yet have such a model.
The above statement directly implies that the fields that are extremely important in modern physical calculations are not abstract expressions, where force is imparted through empty space. Rather, all forces are either imparted via supramolecular entities, or via light, or the interaction of the two.
In some cases, these fields are just confined into a single supramolecular shell. Or more specifically, the wave equation for an atom/molecule actually describes the supramolecular shell of these atoms/molecules. This might raise the question of whether all fields are supramolecular shells. My educated guess is “not exactly”. It appears that there are plenty of cases, especially relating to magnetism, where the magnetic core (mostly containing iron) influences its surroundings, clearly meaning that the field can consist of more than one type of atom/molecule. However, what type of alignment of molecules does a magnetic fields cause, is a bit unclear. Just looking at the alignment of iron filings aligned around a bar magnet, this physical field appears to be that of supramolecular shells, and not of individual molecules. While it might seem unintuitive, there are almost definitely supramolecular shells of air molecules (oxygen, nitrogen and possibly water vapor) aligned in the few gaps between the arced iron filings.
This example of a physical field might not convince every reader, but let me ask a counter-question? Could you think of a field that couldn’t be described as a string of physical entities? If so, where is the evidence that the space in which the field should exist wasn’t organized?
I’ll answer this question myself: if you don’t believe there to be order in the gaseous or liquid phase, it seems evident that fields aren’t molecular entities. And if you believe that the field are these ethereal entities where force is imparted without physical contact, the whole notion of claiming supramolecular order in gases and liquids seems far-fetched.
Again, it’s crucial to note that the notion of fields being a supramolecular phenomenon does not change the mathematics one bit. That’s not the point of this observation. It’s more an inevitable conclusion of understanding that there are no true fundamental forces, but just the interactions of the strings that make up matter and light.
Comments